this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
714 points (97.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

geteilt von: https://lemmit.online/post/3018791

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ProgrammerHumor by /u/polytopelover on 2024-05-26 21:23:20+00:00.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alexdeathway@programming.dev 201 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (14 children)

First one are method name, second one are status name.


def open_file_dialog(self):
       self.dialog_file_open = True
       pass

Yoda level preference war.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 100 points 6 months ago (11 children)

I tend to add is to booleans toreally differentiate between a method name and a status.

def open_file_dialog(self):
    self.dialog_file_is_open = True
    pass

That way, it's easier for my dumb brain to spot which is which at a glance.

[–] fourwd@programming.dev 18 points 6 months ago (5 children)

In Elixir, we mark statuses by using a question mark at the end of the variable name. Something like this:

authorized? = user |> get_something() |> ensure_authorized?()

I like this better than the is_ prefix

[–] cytokine0724@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We do this in Ruby all the time, we just prefer methods over variables, usually.

def authorized?
  current_user&.authorized?
end
[–] cytokine0724@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

I'm a principal backend engineer routinely writing Ruby for my day job, so I'm familiar, lol. But you can't do it for local variables and that just sucks. Definitely a +1 for Elixir.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)