this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
470 points (99.2% liked)

Uplifting News

11482 readers
15 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 7 points 6 months ago (6 children)

At around 1700f, yeah. Silicone burns at around half that, so it would be an improvement regardless.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 1 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Ah, I just assume as it was carbon it would still be quite low (relatively)

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just like humans are basically just trees, because they're both carbon based lifeforms, right?

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 2 points 6 months ago

Na, we are bags of water for the purposes of most approximations

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)