this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
266 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2510 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 125 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You can probably drop the “lol” part.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 84 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)
[–] Kadaj21@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m a millennial, i do it all the time lol

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I thought "lol" was short for "Just wanted to let you know that I'm a millennial so you can better understand where I'm coming from with this comment."

Does it have a different meaning?

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 months ago

I felt weird typing that col

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In this case, it's more like "loltac."

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

That's actually always the subtext of people who end every statement with "lol"

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Project 2025 is the culmination of 50 years 'lesser evil' voting. Instead of accepting no evil, democrats tolerated right wing politics and its policies as long as it had a D next to its name.

Marginalized communities have been living with versions of P2025 all their lives. This only scares white liberals because its something that finally targets them. Democrats demanded we ignore our oppressors and vote for them and didnt have our backs. Now we wont have theirs for the mess liberals created.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

You had me in the middle bit

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I can’t argue with any of that. What I’m stuck on is just what the fuck to do now and what comes next.

Can you elaborate on your thoughts? I honestly can’t see a way out except for eating another shit sandwich and hoping that incrementalism can save us once sanity returns. But fuck, we’re cooked, sanity is gone for good so I’m out of ideas and the alternative only makes it worse for everyone. I’m at a point where I’m happy to vote against my best interests but that’s kinda what I feel I’ve been doing all this time.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Incrementalism is what got us here. We were led to believe that incremental baby steps is what was necessary for progress. They use those incremental baby steps as small, little, minute, undetectable steps to the right. They compartmentalized the rightward shift so all we saw were small puzzle pieces and couldn't piece them together to show the larger overall picture. And when people started to challenge their views, they would throw the marginalized communities in front of them to defend their actions, ' you challenging our systems might hurt this black person, it might throw this lgbtq+ person under the bus,' etc. and I use that tactic to silence opposition. It's the same tactic that Republicans use when they scream 'save the children'

If incrementalism actually worked, we wouldn't be having the same discussions about wages and housing and healthcare and education that we were having 50 60 70 years ago.

Regarding P2025 we are at the

Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me

Martin Niemöller's poem First They Came

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So right, I get all that, but I’m not terribly interested in retribution for what got us here, I’m interested in tangible ways to go forward. I think all our choices are shit right now so what, just don’t vote so that I can sniff my own farts for being above it all?

I’m at the point where I agree…ish. I do believe that there is a lot of deliberate actions by the power structure of both parties but I see some actual humanity and thought coming from one side, pure spite and malice from the other and complete and utter insanity from the comedy option. Problem is the humanity in the party has gotten nothing done (not for their lack of trying) and has no control so I am have officially given up on them.

So I’m left with zero options. Great fucking country we have here that I’m utterly trapped within.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think it would help to imagine this as if we've already arrived at the peak of fascism - what would you be doing then? Likely mutual aid, political (probably undergroud) organizing, civil disobedience, ect. This is what they mean when anarchists say 'you can't vote fascism away', and this is what leftists mean when they say voting in this election doesn't really address the crisis.

The hard work of resisting fascism happens everywhere but the ballot box.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The hard work of resisting fascism happens everywhere but the ballot box.

You realize that doing all of that hard work would be much harder under Trump than Biden right?

Even if you're the most communist person ever, it makes sense to vote for Biden, he atleast tolerates your existence, and that'll make all praxis easier than under Mr. "Root out the communist vermin" Trump

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Biden doesn't tolerate our existence any more than Trump, they are equally hostile to everyone that challenges their power

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Bullshit.

Biden has never once called communists vermin, never once called for them to be expelled from our society, Biden has worked repeatedly with socialist politicians here and abroad.

There's a monumental difference between Trump and Biden, but I guess if you refuse to engage in basic political analysis and see the difference between Liberalism and Fascism you can just sit on your island over there remaining eternally politically ineffective.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Liberalism is a branch fascism.

has never once called communists vermin, never once called for them to be expelled from our society

He and his party have

Total House vote 328 86

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Trump called immigrants rapists and murderers, but Biden has been deporting just as many or more than Trump ever did when he was in office.

Biden doesn't use fascist rhetoric but he's still liberal with the use of force.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

He doesnt use the fascist rhetoric, but in action hes another Trump

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's not the point: voting is unrelated to the work of uprooting fascism. If you spend all your energy getting Biden elected, you are still no closer to solving the problem.

There is some credence to using that as leverage to get liberals (whose only concern seems to be getting their guy elected) to engage the actual work of eliminating fascism, but that's not what I was advocating here.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That's not the point: voting is unrelated to the work of uprooting fascism.

I mean that's partially true, but If the praxis for destroying American fascism is going to be so much harder under the rule of the fascist rather than the rule of the liberal, then shouldn't making sure the liberal stays be a prerequisite to the other praxis?

If you spend all your energy getting Biden elected, you are still no closer to solving the problem.

I certainly don't think it's the only thing leftists should be focusing on. We need more organization around lots of things other than electoral politics (Union's, Economic Rights, Building Up Socialist Orgs, etc), but I don't see us making real gains federally with any of these other spheres of organizing with Trump in power.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

shouldn't making sure the liberal stays be a prerequisite to the other praxis?

Certainly not a prerequisite, no. The work that needs doing is no different in either case, and is met with hostility (of different scales, sure) under either presidency. Both will protect the institutions we seek to dismantle with force; one will simply be more open about it than the other.

For a leftist, neither candidate changes that reality. It will simply be more comfortable under one than the other.

[–] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

For a leftist, neither candidate changes that reality. It will simply be more comfortable under one than the other.

I mean, I'm perfectly aware Biden isn't going to institute an American Meidner plan or start nationalizing key infrastructure and industries tomorrow and would probably vehemently oppose anyone trying to do so.

But if all I have to do is show up one day this year, and try and get my friends to do the same, just to not be possibly persecuted for any LGBT or socialist affiliations, that feels like not that big of a hassle for the gain of atleast keeping the status quo.

Every other volunteering and organizing day of the year is still going to be towards something not directly related to electoral politics.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social -1 points 6 months ago

The problem is that, as I see it, we are at a point where we can't just show up one day. I would rather light a fire under your ass to help address the existential problems than nod my head solemnly in agreement that the best we can do is not have a Trump presidency.

And it isn't just that Biden won't be involved with a socialist agenda, it's that he's all too happy to let the pigs spray down protestors working to push for change and accuse them of being paid actors. Right now, he's in a spot where he has to listen to his base, so now is absolutely not the time to absolve him of all his inadequacies.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 1 points 6 months ago

Thanks, I appreciate the perspective, I’m trying to pull myself out of this bullshit, never been more clear that my vote means nothing, the system does as the system does.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

People keep saying this and everytime I go to the website I find nothing but very vague assertions and a link to a long book.

Can someone give me some of the high level summaries? Thanks in advance.