this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
178 points (96.4% liked)

World News

38831 readers
2495 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io -5 points 5 months ago (11 children)

Just because you don't like the message, doesn't mean they're wrong.

[–] ormr@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

Well it's baffling to me to have "pollution" as the first point of that list. It's just beyond my comprehension how one could state that a non-combustion car doesn't help with pollution problems. Yes alright, there's still microplastics... But hey, please visit a city like Beijing and tell me again that EVs don't combat pollution on a massive scale.

It's nice to be critical and yes, cars are shit for our society. Nevertheless our society has been built around them and people will drive cars. They might do so less in 50 years but right here right now with the way society is organised EVs do definitely play an important part in reducing emissions. Change takes time. And people like the ones protesting against the Gigafactory prefer to ignore this context. To me this line of thinking is naive to say the least and can also be seen as self-righteous and delusional by those for whom no alternative is available now. Lecturing people about their lifestyle is not going to change anything.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Car tires account for a third of microplastics emissions in Germany. Cars are a major source of pollution, especially compared with alternatives like Bikes or Public transport.

And that is purely talking about operational emissions. The production and disposal of EVs is another huge source of pollution and GHG emissions.

[–] ormr@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for telling me again. Very helpful but besides the point.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

So your point is to ignore the total environmental impact of a product and just cherrypick the one category in which it is better?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)