this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
219 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3190 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (6 children)

No, it still means what it always has, and each step still introduces good gains.

It's just that each step is getting smaller and MUCH more difficult and we still aren't entirely sure what to do after we get to 1. In the past we were able to go from 65nm in 2006 to 45 in 2008. We had 7nm in 2020, but in that same 2 year time frame we are only able to get to 5nm

And now we've reached the need for decimal steps with this 1.6.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Later each new generation process became known as a technology node[17] or process node,[18][19] designated by the process' minimum feature size in nanometers (or historically micrometers) of the process's transistor gate length, such as the "90 nm process". However, this has not been the case since 1994,[20] and the number of nanometers used to name process nodes (see the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors) has become more of a marketing term that has no standardized relation with functional feature sizes or with transistor density (number of transistors per unit area).[21]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiconductor_device_fabrication#Feature_size

personally, I don't care they try to simplify these extremely complicated chip layouts, but keep calling it X nanometers when there's nothing of that feature size is just plain misleading.

[–] lemmytellyousomething@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

yes, boss, I have always worked 42 hours per week... Huh? No, what do you mean "actual hours"?

[–] Bademantel@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago

Hahaha, I love that!

load more comments (3 replies)