this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
208 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2510 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 108 points 7 months ago (3 children)

If they rule he does I promise to riot every day. There won't even be a point in maintaining the status quo as such a ruling would invalidate democracy

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 76 points 7 months ago (4 children)

If they rule Trump does then that means Biden does too. It would basically be giving Biden a license to ship them all to Guantanamo. Might be the only thing that holds back such a decision.

[–] radiant_bloom@lemm.ee 53 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Ship them to Guantanamo ? You’re too nice. If presidents have immunity, Biden could strangle him to death with his own bare hands on live television if he wanted to 💀

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Live on Pay-per-view & you've got a deal.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

I wouldn't even illegally stream that. I'd pay full fucking price.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well Senate could convict him after being impeached.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

He could just ignore all that shit, claim immunity, and refuse to leave office.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Biden would never do that because him and the Dems in power still worship the status quo and see Trumpism as a minor hiccup in their peaceful balance with the Republicans. The left will continue to get steamrolled by the right because of ineffective leadership.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Euh, for you, Biden is Left? You should check out what left and right mean in politics IMO.

Also, I don't think "the dems" do everything to keep some sort of imaginary balance, but because they are less terrible people, is all.

European here.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

what is subjectivism?

Biden is the de facto ideologue of the only meaningful, most-left-leaning political body in the U.S. Calling him "right" (which he is globally) within the context of intra-American discussion would be unnecessarily confusing. Everyone relevant in this comment section understood my message.

[–] just2look@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

The Overton window in the US it’s absurdly far right. So not actively working toward fascism is the left.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Sound counter argument. I have no rebuttal.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Biden wouldn't do shit and they know it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If they rule Trump does then that means Biden does too.

No it doesn't. I guarantee they will do all the Olympic-level mental gymnastics necessary to craft the bullshit opinion in such a way that it applies to Trump but not Biden.

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

If they do, Biden needs to immediately pack the court and remove lifetime appointments.

He should be doing it already IMO

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Removing lifetime appointments to the supreme court would require a constitutional amendment, which... Good luck with that.

Even increasing the number of justices on the court would need congressional action, which isn't going to happen in this Congress.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

If Trump gets immunity, I'm becoming a terrorist.