this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
109 points (78.2% liked)
Showerthoughts
29786 readers
306 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- Avoid politics
- 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
- 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
- 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You have it the wrong way round; humans invented god.
Can you not just leave it out for a bit? It's irritating now.
This is Lemmy. You cannot go 5 posts without someone acting like a 2007 edgy internet atheist. I assume this is where they all ended up.
I can! But it's often like I can't say "God love him" without some self-assured milksop craning his neck to tell me God can't love him because God doesn't exist.
I can't go too far either without seeing a sign saying smoking kills or drunk driving is something you shouldn't do.
It's edgy for someone to be atheist?
I thought we'd snuffed this shite-arse logic out with "toxic masculinity"? They said "acting like a 2007 edgy internet atheist", not "being atheist, which makes them edgy".
Literally all they did was suggest the opposite scenario. What exactly is edgy about it? It's the atheism being taken issue with clearly, there's no internet edgy about it. If that is edgy, then it basically says "anyone who disagrees with me is 2007 internet edgy."
I don't know, ask them yourself?
If billions of people believed Santa Claus existed, and forced their beliefs on other people, wouldn't you get sick of it?
Religion has killed many millions of people, standing up and calling it out for it's lies and nonsense is the right thing to do.
Christianity hasn't killed people. People who would have killed people anyway taking parts of Christian scripture out of context has killed people. By that logic, scientific studies have killed people due to eugenics. Should that mean that we should ban the study of science or even genetics? Absolutely not!
What do you categorise as "forcing their beliefs on other people"?
I wonder what the hundreds of thousands burned alive for not being Christian would say to your comment.
See, I could reply to this with "nothing, because there's no afterlife". That's what's irritating: taking figures of speech or offhand comments based on this old idea of God and opting to be a humourless little twerp about them.
Where does the Bible say to burn people alive for not being Christian?
How do you define god
import god
It's just a namespace