this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
306 points (89.8% liked)

World News

32348 readers
477 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (26 children)

There's no way to sugarcoat it: in order to extract milk you must r--- the cow and then kill its baby, then if you don't milk them, they die.

The treatment of animals is so bad that b-------ty laws have literally failed to pass because they would have criminalized the whole industry, and that's not even to mention the times when people who call out overt, malicious abuse suffer more consequences than the ones doing it.

Basically; the sooner we shut the system down the better. It's unsustainable and only being held together by subsidies anyway.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (19 children)

Rape the cow and kill the baby? Lol what planet are you on? Most farms have a bull.. and "killing the baby", you mean like later in life to eat?

If you don't milk them they die? No.. They stop producing milk

[–] Applejuicy@feddit.nl 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Did you just want to bingo falsehoods? Or did you want to provoke people into providing links for every claim? Either way, you succeeded I guess.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 7 months ago

If this was a use of Cunningham's law, it was very well done. It really read like someone regurgitating all the stuff the animal farming industry can't legally say (because it's false) but implies really hard in advertising.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)