this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
355 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

34655 readers
630 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago (7 children)

The ones used for 4K recordings are not slow 100+MBps, I won't say prone to failure as such, flash storage can only handle a finite number of writes but we can mitigate that by using wear leveling.

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

That's pretty slow for terabyte sized storage. And slow compared to the alternatives, too (600 MB/s or Gabs/s).

Spinning hard disks are faster than this, too. Have been for decade(s).

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Hehe, I think I haven't caught up with the improvements, flash with 1GB/s transfer speed is ludicrously fast!

[–] progandy@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Other formats can exceed that by caching & writing to multiple chips at once i guess.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)