this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
192 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
4123 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In his bid to retake the White House, few states hold as much promise for Donald Trump as Michigan.

The former president has already won the state once and President Joe Biden, who reclaimed it for Democrats in 2020, is confronting vulnerabilities there as he seeks reelection. Trump’s campaign promises an aggressive play for Michigan as part of a robust swing-state strategy.

But, at least for now, those promises appear to be mostly talk. The Trump campaign and its partners at the Republican National Committee haven’t yet made significant general election investments in the state, according to Michigan Republican Party Chairman Pete Hoekstra. The national committee, he said, hasn’t transferred any money to the state party to help bolster its operations heading into the general election. There are no specific programs in place to court voters of color. And there’s no general election field staff in place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (5 children)

That or for Biden to make a huge error.

Like supporting Israel's genocide of Palestinians when there's a substantial Palestinian and Arab population in Michigan?

[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Supporting Israel is definitely Biden's biggest and ongoing political mistake so far, but we have yet to see whether its actually a huge error. I'm hoping Biden turns around his decision sooner rather than later because too many people are suffering, and things will get worse in the US if Trump wins as I bet a huge reason may be because of Israel.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Which is crazy, because the alternative is a guy who fully supports Bibi and loves to see brown people suffer

[–] StarPupil@ttrpg.network 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, see, passively continuing policy while trying to rachet it back when you realize how unpopular something is with your base is exactly the same as active hostility and escalation, fully justifying my refusal to participate in the system. I'm very smart.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Almost as smart as those who have the magical thinking that a third party candidate is clearly the only choice to solve this problem

[–] StarPupil@ttrpg.network 2 points 7 months ago

No, see, the spoiler effect, a well-documented phenomenon, isn't real and is just a lie to keep people from voting for third parties, who are super for real going to affect anything positively this time! It's your fault for not abandoning the only party with a chance to win against the fascist party in favor of checks notes Cornel West, a candidate so unserious he declared his party affiliation with the People's Party (a bunch of definitely not grifters featuring such intellectual titans as Jimmy Dore and Jesse "the Body/Mind" Ventura) only to immediately switch to the Green Party, only to immediately switch to Independent. Math isn't real and I'm very smart.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)