this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
181 points (98.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35876 readers
1206 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The sun dial worked during daylight, but how did people agree on what time it was at night before clocks were invented?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 154 points 9 months ago (3 children)

There were some timekeeping approaches, including candles marked with the hours based on burn rate (also used as alarm clocks by sticking metal things in them that would fall on a bell or metal dish below), but there also wasn't a lot of reason to know the time accurately at night. Hell, in the time before clocks, there wasn't much need to know the time accurately in the day. People used sunrise, noon, and sunset as the major markers.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 48 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Even up to the advent of trains, time was very localized. Timezones didn't exist, and people would just come to a general consensus on what time it was, often via a clocktower or similar structure.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I remember reading once that if you time traveled back to Europe anywhere beyond 200 years, the majority of people would not know what year it was. All they understood was summer winter summer winter, someone born two years ago, someone died five years ago, that's it.

The church kept track of Holy days but even that was an ongoing controversy with everyone.

You could go back to 1123 and there might be a hundred people that kept track of the year but even they wouldn't agree with one another.

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

So how do we know it's really 2024?

[–] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

By comparing historical accounts of known events with stable periods, like eclipses or comets.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago

I thought we figured out it wasn't though? If we were counting time correctly it would be 2028-2030 right now.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Faith and common belief ... it's the same system that basically works for many of the cultural ideas outside of actual science that we all use. Money, calendars, time, historic cultural units of measurements ... all based on belief, habit and repetition.

We don't know if it is actually 2024 ... we just have 8 billion people (maybe 7,999,999,998 if you and I don't agree) who all believe that it is 2024 that is all.

[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Huh... i man, I guess over time, timekeeping began to solidify. So when did we actually start keeping a common date? I know some religions or cultures think it's way off of 2024. But when did a strong common use of calendars come About?

[–] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

This simply isn't true. People kept track of the year, even if it wasn't the Julian calendar, stuff like "the third year of the reign of king George".

[–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, even in the world after the invention of clocks knowing the time down to the minute isn't very important for most people most of the time. Sure, it can be useful on occasion, but people put way too much emphasis on way too small of time units way too often.

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The only thing is that it severely limits the options to meet somewhere when all you got is dawn, noon, and dusk.

[–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sure, but pretending you're all going to meet at exactly 4:37 or whatever is just lie. Nobody is actually accurate down to the minute in their casual lives, and using units that are more precise than they are accurate is just lying about your accuracy. You can use modern clocks without pretending that single minutes matter. That's why some people still talk about things like quarter hours even when using digital clocks. That's a much more human kind of timescale.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Matters for public transport tbh

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Matters for public transport tbh

Which didn't operate on that strict a time schedule (if at all) in the time period OP is asking about.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

Fair. I'd hate to show up to my bus 5 minutes early just to realise it left 10 minutes early, though

[–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hey, if you live in a place where the public transport actually shows up when it's supposed to that's nice for you, I guess, but where I'm from pretending that the public transport is accurate down to the minute is also a lie.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

I do, if it's early it just waits. Although tbh usually it's 1-2 minutes late which isn't a big deal

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yep, quarter hours are how we normally function today. Which is fine and I wholly agree. You still need the second for that system to function though, as you can't get that without measuring time.

[–] zephr_c@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I mean, the actual length of a second is pretty arbitrary. We could use a different basic unit of time and still be fine, but I get the point you're making. I was never trying to argue that the invention of the clock was a bad thing, just that modern society has a problem with overly precise "measurement" of things that themselves aren't actually as consistent as the measurements.

[–] Pandoras_Can_Opener@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Germany enters the chat.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

There were things like tracking guard shifts after sundown but the candle or an hourglass would be sufficient for that. It's usually a case where you don't actually care about what time it is now but you do care about time elapsed.