this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72788 readers
2738 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
1
Scientists develop game-changing vaccine against Lyme disease ticks (www.newsweek.com)
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Scientists develop game-changing vaccine against Lyme disease ticks::Researchers have developed a way to vaccinate people such that the ticks that cause Lyme disease cannot be colonized by the bacteria that cause the disease.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uberkalden@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Is your stance really to go all in on treatment over prevention?

[–] jerkjaguar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Not for all ailments, but for this yes.

I recommend checking out the CDC information or numerous other studies on Lyme disease and taking your own position rather than blindly excepting a random article on social media as truth and the only acceptable opinion.

[–] deranger@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Detection and treatment of Lyme is notoriously difficult. Why would you not prefer a preventive solution?

[–] crimroy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bc despite their claim, op is antivax. There's no other explanation

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Watching anti-science folks here get downvoted to oblivion feels goodGandalf gif where he tells the Barlog to go back to the shadows.