this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
142 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3331 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Computer scientist shows how to tamper with Georgia voting machine, in election security trial: “All it takes is five seconds and a Bic pen.”::An expert witness for plaintiffs seeking to bar Georgia's touchscreen voting machines showed a crowded courtroom how he could tamper with election res

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In California we have electronic voting machines that are basically glorified printers. You go through the vote flow, then it prints your ballot and you can verify it's correct before it goes in the ballot box. All the upside of electronic voting and none of the downsides. Since it's printed consistently it's easier to electronically count as well without mistakes that can happen from scanning hand filled ballots. Even human vote counters can mistakenly read a hand filled ballot.

[–] Grellan@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's how it is in Georgia to. You make your selection, receive a print out which has your chooses visible on kt, put that into the counting machine which is next to a table where you get your I voted sticker so it's monitored for tampering. They then take your print out and put it in a box for manual recounts if called for.

[–] Waldowal@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But don't you then put it into a scanner that actually tallies the votes? The paper exists, but my understanding is it's not a hand count. There is still opportunity to manipulate the scanner.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

But you still have the paper ballot so that when it's time for a recount you can validate the electronic and paper copies match.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

How it is in Texas too.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

That is fine, and a good usecase