this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
580 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2559 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 230 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Yes, I’m unapologetically pro-life. … I am fine with a federal law

Ladies and gentlemen, this is your “moderate” Republican candidate.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 79 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, that IS moderate for a Republican. The more typical party view is Make America Handmaid's Tale.

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Their point is that that's only moderate by today's standards. It wasn't 20 or 30 years ago. But like they said, "MODERN" republican

It looks like both of the people referred to moderate but as to your point about modern, I wonder if there has been that much of a change in the last 20-30 (or 50 or 100) years as much as perhaps modern technology providing a louder megaphone, and as a result greater "reward" for being more and more--outlandish--to put it politely?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't usually wish for this, but I hope she gets an ectopic pregnancy and is forced to carry to term

Realistically she'd just fly herself to NY

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don’t wish that pain and suffering on anyone. Ever her terrible ass.

That said, she’s 100% the type of person that would get the medical care, and never mention it on the trail, and continue to try and win over the nuts who want a ban.

She already lies to her base in order to get votes.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 27 points 10 months ago

That's okay, I'll wish hard enough for both of us.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Some people deserve bad things to happen to them no matter how unethical it is to wish for, or do. Unethical maybe, but justified entirely. Our society is up against the clock on ecological and social issues and being ethical in the current system will not save it.

[–] Tak@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Don't most people die if they get ectopic pregnancies without medical assistance?

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tak@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

This civility is why I come here :D

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Of the party of freedom!

[–] thesprongler@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I don't like to play devil's advocate, but there is a sliver of light between "I am fine with" and "I will push for" a federal law. Both terrible stances given the makeup of this country.