this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
1007 points (98.3% liked)

memes

10393 readers
1914 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Maybe its because i'm not a fan of the books, but I really like Foundation, it has weak points, but overall I'm enjoying it.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 10 points 10 months ago

I went into it expecting it to have nothing to do with the books. I found all the characters' behaviors irrational and frustrating, with the exception of the emperor.

And I'm getting really sick of incompetent protagonists and impossibly flawless antagonists. I think that's just a reflection of the zeitgeist of the world's masses, but that's another discussion. Suffice to say I'm tired of it being the only trope used in SciFi TV anymore.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

From what I've heard, it literally flips the premise of the novels.

[–] Jagermo@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I like both. The novels are good, but would not work today - they have been writen in the 50s and it Shows.

The series might have slow points, but I really like the emperors and the genetic dynasty, great storytelling device.

[–] r_se_random@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think the novels would've worked regardless of time. The whole point of Foundation as a series was that there's no real protagonist in the series; the society as an aggregate works in a certain way as dictated by the rules of psychohistory. The concept wouldn't have translated into a good TV show.

The show that we got is more of a generic space action, which has some interesting parts, but meh for most of it.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I think it's just easier to write the hero's journey instead of systems. GoT was good at the latter.

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I like both. The novels are good, but would not work today - they have been writen in the 50s and it Shows.

"Her breasts were a smaller version of the woman herself -- massive, firm, and overpoweringly impressive." -Isaac Asimov

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

TIL making fun of writers for talking about women as sexual objects is 'sex bad.'

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I love the show. The best part of the show, far and away, is the part that isn’t in the books — the Genetic Dynasty.