this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
26 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

34987 readers
425 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Company does business. More at 11.

[–] Ropianos@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Country builds up industry to not rely on opposing country in preparation for war.

Maybe we should be slightly concerned about that? IMHO it shows that Chinas ambition for Taiwan are quite serious.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm far from pro China, but I think this is a bit of an unfair assessment. Simplest explanation is theyre trying to look out for their economy. They've basically been sanctioned out of high end processors. They need to make their own now.

Yes, but a decent portion of why they've been sanctioned is because of said antagoniziation towards Taiwan

[–] Ropianos@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Sure, that's certainly a valid point. But at the very least it shows that they don't expect the sanctions to stop anytime soon. Of course that doesn't necessarily mean that a war with Taiwan is coming.

load more comments (2 replies)