this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
316 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3331 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wizards of the Coast denies, then confirms, that Magic: The Gathering promo art features AI elements | When will companies learn?::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 6 points 10 months ago (22 children)

I don't understand the problem people have with AI art, anyone care to convince me how it's somehow immoral to use a computer for making art work?

[โ€“] Toadvark@mander.xyz 55 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Speaking as a professional artist myself, I'd wager that many of the responses you've run into are emotional ones. Supporting oneself as an artist was already difficult, and AI generation is an astoundingly powerful tool. For a long time there was a sense of financial security in quieter/grunt background and asset design work such as the WotC backgrounds in this situation. WotC in particular was touted as "one of the companies that actually pays artists to make neat things" in fantasy art circles, and so their fans and artist clients (often one in the same) feel betrayed.

I'm personally a sad-bitch about it because my peers and I have been posting art for one-another and fans online since 2002, our work was scraped, and now people can click a button to ape the look of all of our work without having run across it organically, knowing our names, or being able to, like, say hello to us. I really don't mean that out of self-importance or ego- the community I grew up in online was all about discovering working artists by word of mouth this way, and getting to know them. So it's a weird (albeit unintentional) dismantling of a community and "a way that was", so to speak.

More practically one of my specific worries regarding AI generated images: Illustration in the literal sense of the word means 'to illuminate', to make clear'. Think along the lines of technical illustration- biological in my case, but this extends to mechanical parts, manuals, diagrams, medical books. These are situations where clarity is seriously important, and I feel like the deluge of generated images (and the general public's lack of information about how the image gen works and how to decipher them) will cause harm.

Hopefully that wasn't too much of a ramble. ๐Ÿซค TLDR: It isn't necessarily immoral, but people are emotional, it's a big change, and it's happening really damn fast.

[โ€“] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

it IS immoral unless you consider theft a moral act.

[โ€“] daniskarma@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You wouldn't download an artist.

[โ€“] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

i would if i could.

[โ€“] RagingRobot@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What if you are stealing bread to feed a starving family?

[โ€“] FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

that doesn't make it right. would it be right to rob a bank if you were homeless? or better yet, is squatting ok if you're homeless?

load more comments (20 replies)