this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
95 points (97.0% liked)

World News

36793 readers
574 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 7 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Only 56% of the population has access to a drinking water source.

I don't get it... how do the rest survive?

[–] voight@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Containers alone. Or a mixture of containers for important things & low quality sources if available

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Yes but they must fill their containers at a drinking water source...

Maybe it's a language thing I'm not understanding.

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes but they must fill their containers at a drinking water source…

Maybe it’s a language thing I’m not understanding.

I assume the article means that only 56% of the population have access to modernized drinking water sources (i.e. properly treated fresh water). More than likely SEED (Veolia) has been only concerned with profit, therefore neglecting to extend infrastructure outside urban areas.

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 2 points 2 years ago

Ok yea, that makes more sense to me. Thanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)