this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
128 points (68.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2406 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In a letter published Wednesday on Medium, an anonymous group of Biden's campaign staffers demanded the president call for a ceasefire in Gaza, citing concerns that not shifting his policy on the issue could hurt his 2024 chances.


"Biden for President staff have seen volunteers quit in droves, and people who have voted blue for decades feel uncertain about doing so for the first time ever, because of this conflict," the Medium letter read.

"It is not enough to merely be the alternative to Donald Trump," the campaigners continued. "The campaign has to shift the feeling in the pits of voters' stomachs, the same feeling that weighs on us every day as we fight for your reelection. The only way to do that is to call for a ceasefire."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Which makes sense. Campaign volunteers tend to skew younger, and the younger demographic really cares about the Israel/Palestine debacle.

But, again, what are they going to do? Campaign for "no President has done more for Israel" Trump?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/16/politics/trump-american-jews-israel/index.html

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

But, again, what are they going to do? Campaign for “no President has done more for Israel” Trump?

Not campaign at all. Which I'm sure someone here will interpret as being identical to campaigning for Trump.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah who needs political activism anyway! Oh wait… that’s how we got into this fucked mess in the first place.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can absolutely be an activist who doesn't work under a particular party or politician

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yes exactly. Like the displaced mentally ill guy who yells at the commuters downtown. Completely free of corporate entanglements.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It pretty much is, or if they push to a 3rd party who will end up taking away 5-10% of the vote, that's just as good as campaigning for Trump.

Stein, Kennedy, West have absolutely no hope of winning even a single state, much less the election, but they will make it certain that Biden doesn't win.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Really? Everyone who isn't actively campaigning for Biden is campaigning for Trump? Is there anything else to which Biden is entitled by virtue of being the second worst candidate?

If I don't sell everything I own and donate every dime to Biden, have I actually sold everything I owned and donated it to Trump?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Is there anything else to which Biden is entitled by virtue of being the second worst candidate?

Well now that you ask, you also need to talk about how amazing the economy is, and how young and vigorous he is, and like how much safer we are with a secure Israel and stuff.

Any conversation that isn’t talking about how amazing Biden is, is propaganda for Trump.

(Excuse me while I go wash my mouth out.)

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Everyone who isn't actively supporting Biden will make sure Trump wins. Yes.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, you've certainly worked out who to blame.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So if I'm not out bothering my neighbors by knocking on doors and littering the highway with signs I'm campaigning for Trump?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you aren't supporting Biden you are actively helping elect Trump. Yes.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Case in point.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Per Biden himself, there are 50 others who can beat Trump. So, if Biden withdrew his candidacy- like he promised he would last time, there’s zero risk.

In fact, I would say not doing so is the greater risk.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

I guarantee all fifty of those other people would also support Israel.

The neat part about America is that it doesn't care what you think, and will do heinous shit regardless. But you still have to vote or you're a bad person.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh, there's no doubt Biden should bounce, and if Trump gets convicted, or otherwise removed from consideration at the RNC in July, I expect Biden to bow out and we'll get a new candidate at the DNC in August.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

biden bowing out after a trump conviction is probably the only thing that's more dangerous than biden not bowing out.

The trials don't begin until late spring, early summer at the earliest, so him bowing out after a conviction is going to be an insanely short window for whoever takes up the canidacy (and is after primaries,) He needs to be bowing out now to let the primary process actually happen.

Anything else means running the risk of trump winning.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh, the primaries aren't going to happen. Any replacement, on either side, will have to be at the conventions in July and August.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

which will probably be before trump's conviction(s).

I'm okay with trump leaving the next guy with a shit show, but Biden is supposed to be the "rational adult in the room".

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it is indeed a choice between eating shit and being flayed alive.

Like yes...i might survive eating shit, and I definitely don't want to be flayed alive, but wow...what a choice to have to make. Rock The Vote, 2024. Lol.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Man, it's like - every president for the past four decades has been in a shit eating contest, and Biden is the least shit-eating so far - is 'he eats too much shit' really the issue you want to make central to his candidacy? Especially when most voters are in favor of continuing to eat shit, for god knows what fucking reason?

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

I'm surprised how many people seem to have forgotten South Park's episode about deciding whether you want to vote for a douche or a turd sandwich.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee -2 points 10 months ago

Because it's only "eating shit" to the privileged, for folks that live the difference every second of the day, that difference is between a luxury buffet and being the one who's actually at risk of being flayed alive.